Holmes v. Fanning et al
| Tysha S Holmes |
| Eric K Fanning and Department of the Army |
| 3:2017cv00682 |
| March 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Lexington |
| Margaret B Seymour |
| Kaymani D West |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
188
Order Vacating 186 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Appeal and granting 185 Motion for Extension of Time for Appeal and Extending Time to Appeal until July 6, 2020. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 5/29/2020. (asni, )
|
|
Filing
179
ORDER AND OPINION granting 153 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 153 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 3/3/2020.(asni, ) (Main Document 179 replaced on 3/3/2020) (asni, ). Modified to replace document to correct typo on 3/3/2020 (asni, ).
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION accepting 128 Report and Recommendation, granting in part denying in part 84 Motion for Summary Judgment. The court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Pl aintiff's Title VII disparate-treatment claims (Claims 4 and 6). (ECF No. 84). Further, to the extent that Plaintiff's Complaint is liberally construed as an appeal of the Equal Employment Opportunity Office's dismissal of claims 1, 2, 3 and 5, the agency's determination is affirmed. Accordingly, claims 1, 2, 3 and 5 are DISMISSED. Finally, the court clarifies the Report insofar as the court only GRANTS the Motion as to claims addressed by the parties (Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6). Plaintiff's Title VII retaliation and disability discrimination claims remain before the court. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 8/20/2019. (asni, )
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER denying 83 Motion For Expenses for Failure to Attend Deposition and Motion to Compel Deposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 07/23/2019.(dsto, )
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court concurs in the 40 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and incorporates it herein by reference. Defendants' 31 motion to dismiss is denied. The matter is recommitted to the Magistrate Judge for additional pretrial handling. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 11/15/2017. (prou, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
