Chuang v. Kimyagarov
Plaintiff: Alan Chuang
Defendant: Ruben Kimyagarov
Case Number: 3:2017cv01839
Filed: July 11, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Columbia Office
County: XUS, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Paige J Gossett
Presiding Judge: Terry L Wooten
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION accepting 11 Report and Recommendation and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice and without issuance of service of process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 for failure to prosecute, mooting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 7/3/2018. (asni, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chuang v. Kimyagarov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alan Chuang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ruben Kimyagarov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?