Walker v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company et al
| Kenneth Dale Walker |
| Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Christina Stewart, Kevin Walston and Jim Armstrong |
| 3:2017cv01935 |
| July 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Lexington |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Margaret B Seymour |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION accepting and modifying 67 Report and Recommendation; granting in part 54 Motion for Summary Judgment; remanding 48 Motion for Summary Judgment. Please note: It is the responsibility of the attorney to supplement the state court record with anything filed in federal court. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 3/8/2019. (asni, ) Modified to edit text on 3/8/2019 (asni, ).
|
|
Filing
39
CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 1/9/2018. (mwal)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER concurring and incorporating 19 Report and Recommendation; granting Defendant Stewart's 9 Motion to Dismiss; granting Defendants Armstrong and Walston's 10 Motion to Dismiss; and dismissing the case without prejudice. If no amended complaint is filed by Plaintiff within fifteen days of the date of entry of this order, the motions to dismiss will be granted with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 10/16/2017. (mwal)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
