Wise v. South Carolina Department of Revenue

Plaintiff: Roselyn Wise
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Revenue
Case Number: 3:2017cv02448
Filed: September 13, 2017
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Columbia Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Margaret B Seymour
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 7, 2017 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER AND OPINION RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 8 Report and Recommendation, summarily dismissing petition with prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 11/6/2017. (mdea ) (Main Document 11 replaced on 11/7/2017) (mdea, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wise v. South Carolina Department of Revenue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roselyn Wise
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Revenue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?