Wolff v. Bee Healthy Medical Weight Loss et al
Plaintiff: Kristy Michelle Wolff
Defendant: Bee Healthy Medical Weight Loss Clinic and Julie
Case Number: 3:2017cv03339
Filed: December 11, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Columbia Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Cameron McGowan Currie
Presiding Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 90 JUDGMENT dismissing the action with prejudice as to Defendants Julie and Valinda Mims and dismissing without prejudice as to Defendant Bee Healthy Medical Weight Loss Clinic Lexington, LLC. (lbak)
January 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 78 MOTION to Deny Release of Medical Records and MOTION for Extension of Time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 1/16/2019. (lbak)
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER directing Plaintiff to mail the summons and complaint to the address listed in this order by October 24, 2018, and directing counsel for defendant to file an acknowledgement of service on the docket upon receipt. Defendant is directed to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the complaint within 21 days of its receipt. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 10/10/2018. (lbak)
October 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER adopting the 59 Report and Recommendation, granting in part Defendants' 33 39 motions to dismiss: Plaintiff's claims under Title VII and the ADA against the individual Defendants Butcher and Mims are dis missed with prejudice, and her Title VII claim is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to Defendant Bee Healthy. Defendant Bee Healthy's motion to dismiss is denied as to the ADA claim. Defendants' motions to strike 53 56 are denied. This matter is re-referred to the Magistrate Judge for further pre-trial proceedings. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 10/1/2018. (bgoo)
February 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER adopting and incorporating 14 Report and Recommendation and denying Plaintiff's motions to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 3, 10). Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee by March 15, 2018. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 2/5/2018. (mwal)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wolff v. Bee Healthy Medical Weight Loss et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristy Michelle Wolff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bee Healthy Medical Weight Loss Clinic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Julie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?