Boyd v. Johnson Food Service et al
Valerie M. Boyd |
Johnson Food Service, Military Food Beverage, Preston Wider and Tim Zimmerman |
3:2017cv03414 |
December 19, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Columbia Office |
Richland |
J Michelle Childs |
Shiva V Hodges |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 68 ORDER re 67 Suggestion of Death filed by Johnson Food Services LLC(Service due by 11/19/2019). Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 10/29/2019. (lbak) |
Filing 66 ORDER granting re 65 MOTION to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 10/2/2019. (lbak) |
Filing 53 ORDER AND OPINION accepting the Magistrate Judge's 47 Report and Recommendation, granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff Valerie M. Boyd's 41 Motion to Amend, granting Defendant Tim Zimmerman's [33 ] Motion to Dismiss, granting in part and denying in part Defendant Trinity Foods, Inc. d/b/a/ Military Food & Beverage's 31 Motion to Dismiss and denying as moot Defendants Johnson Food Services, LLC and Preston Wider, III's 22 Mot ion to Dismiss or Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff is granted leave until Monday, March 25, 2019, to file and serve an amended complaint that is consistent with this Order. (Specific Document due by 3/25/2019.) Signed by Honorable J. Michelle Childs on 3/8/2019. (lbak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.