Harrison v. Kennedy et al
||Eugene P Harrison
||Jennifer C Kennedy and Sumter Housing Authority
||January 8, 2018
||US District Court for the District of South Carolina
||Richard M Gergel
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 7, 2018
ORDER AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part 55 Defendant's Motion to Reconsider. The Court GRANTS Defendant's motion to reconsider only insofar as to clarify that a de nova standard of review applies to PHA determinations contrary to statute or regulation. The motion to reconsider is otherwise DENIED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 11/7/2018.(sshe, )
|October 26, 2018
ORDER AND OPINION The R & R of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 49 ) is ADOPTEDIN PART and REJECTED IN PART. The Court REJECTS the determination of the Magistrate Judge that there is no dispute of material fact regarding when S HA was given Plaintiff's RFTA, and therefore declines to adopt: (i) the sentence beginning on Page 6, line 18 and ending on Page 7, line. 3; (ii) the clause beginning on Page 7, line 10 and ending on Page 7, line 12, and; (iii) thefull paragraph s beginning on Page 8, line 14 and ending on Page 10, line 5. The R & R is otherwise ADOPTED. Therefore, the Court DENIES Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 34 .) as to Plaintiff's claim under the Housing Act of 1937 and GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's disability claims. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 10/26/2018.(sshe, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?