Harrison v. Kennedy et al
| Eugene P Harrison |
| Jennifer C Kennedy and Sumter Housing Authority |
| 3:2018cv00057 |
| January 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Columbia Office |
| Sumter |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Bristow Marchant |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court Denies Defendants' motion to extend the discovery deadline for the reasons set forth in Order. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 8/8/2019. (vdru, )
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER AND OPINION The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion for a protective order (Dkt. No. 83 ) and QUASHES the subpoenas. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 8/7/2019.(sshe, )
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER AND OPINION granting 70 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend. The Court DIRECTS Plaintiff to file the Second Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 4/8/2019.(sshe, )
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part 55 Defendant's Motion to Reconsider. The Court GRANTS Defendant's motion to reconsider only insofar as to clarify that a de nova standard of review applies to PHA determinations contrary to statute or regulation. The motion to reconsider is otherwise DENIED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 11/7/2018.(sshe, )
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER AND OPINION The R & R of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 49 ) is ADOPTEDIN PART and REJECTED IN PART. The Court REJECTS the determination of the Magistrate Judge that there is no dispute of material fact regarding when S HA was given Plaintiff's RFTA, and therefore declines to adopt: (i) the sentence beginning on Page 6, line 18 and ending on Page 7, line. 3; (ii) the clause beginning on Page 7, line 10 and ending on Page 7, line 12, and; (iii) thefull paragraph s beginning on Page 8, line 14 and ending on Page 10, line 5. The R & R is otherwise ADOPTED. Therefore, the Court DENIES Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 34 .) as to Plaintiff's claim under the Housing Act of 1937 and GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's disability claims. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 10/26/2018.(sshe, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
