Jenkins v. S.C. Department of Employment Workforce et al
Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr. |
Office of South Carolina Governor, S.C. Department of Employment Workforce and S.C. Budget and Control Board |
3:2018cv01874 |
July 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Columbia Office |
Orangeburg |
Paige J Gossett |
Terry L Wooten |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr. (bgoo) (Main Document 4 replaced on 7/12/2018 with scan of document reflecting correct filing date (2018).) (bgoo) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr. Response to Motion due by 7/23/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett. (bgoo) (Main Document 3 replaced on 7/12/2018 with scan of document reflecting correct filing date (2018).) (bgoo) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents) (bgoo) (Main Document 1 replaced on 7/12/2018 with scan of document reflecting correct filing date (2018.)) (bgoo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.