Jordan v. Foldessey et al
Plaintiff: Diana Jordan
Defendant: Ashley Shaffer, Patricia Foldessey, South Carolina House of Representatives, Barbara Periera, Brandy Snyder, Nathan Ballentine and JP Morgan Chase Bank
Case Number: 3:2018cv02083
Filed: July 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Columbia Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Anderson
Referring Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2018 Filing 15 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #14 Judgment, #13 Order on Report and Recommendation placed in U.S. Mail to Diana Jordan PO Box 333 White Rock, SC 29177 (mflo, )
September 4, 2018 Filing 14 JUDGMENT in favor of JP Morgan Chase Bank, South Carolina House of Representatives, Ashley Shaffer, Barbara Periera, Brandy Snyder, Nathan Ballentine, Patricia Foldessey against Diana Jordan. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff, Diana Jordan take nothing and this action is is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. (mflo, )
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER adopting #9 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 9/4/18.(mflo, )
August 9, 2018 Filing 11 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 10 Transfer of Case Management, #8 Order, #9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, filed by Diana Jordan placed in U.S. Mail to Diana Jordan (jpet, )
August 9, 2018 Filing 10 ***CASE MANAGEMENT TRANSFERRED to civil case manager for Judge Anderson. Any future filings must be sent to the Clerk's Office at the following address: 901 Richland St., Columbia, SC 29201. (jpet, )
August 9, 2018 Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending this case be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process, re #1 Complaint, filed by Diana Jordan. Objections to R&R due by 8/23/2018 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 8/9/2018. (jpet, )
August 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Motions granted: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) filed by Diana Jordan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 8/9/2018. (jpet, )
July 27, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Diana Jordan. Response to Motion due by 8/10/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Shiva V Hodges.(bshr, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/30/2018: #1 Envelope) (bgoo)
July 27, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nathan Ballentine, Patricia Foldessey, JP Morgan Chase Bank, Barbara Periera, Ashley Shaffer, Brandy Snyder, South Carolina House of Representatives, filed by Diana Jordan. Service due by 10/25/2018 (Attachments: #1 Certificates of Service, #2 Envelope)(bshr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jordan v. Foldessey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ashley Shaffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patricia Foldessey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: South Carolina House of Representatives
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barbara Periera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brandy Snyder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nathan Ballentine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diana Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?