Jones v. Certain Interested Underwriters at Loyd's et al
| Charlie L. Jones |
| Creech, Roddey & Watson, Certain Interested Underwriters at Loyd's, Tapco Underwriters, Inc. and Crawford and Company, Inc. |
| 3:2018cv02618 |
| September 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Insurance |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Certain Interested Underwriters at Loyd's, Crawford and Company, Inc., Creech, Roddey & Watson, Tapco Underwriters, Inc. filed by Charlie L. Jones. Service due by 2/11/2019 (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(cbru, ) |
| Filing 16 OBJECTION to #10 Report and Recommendation by Charlie L. Jones. Reply to Objections due by 11/27/2018 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(cbru, ) |
| Filing 15 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 14 Order,, Set Deadlines,, Terminate Motions, placed in U.S. Mail to Charlie L. Jones (cbru, ) |
| Filing 14 TEXT ORDER granting #13 MOTION for Extension of Time. (Objections to R&R due by 11/16/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45.) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 11/8/2018. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time by Charlie L. Jones. Response to Motion due by 11/20/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Envelope)No proposed order.(cbru, ) |
| Filing 12 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, 11 Transfer of Case Management, and #9 Order placed in U.S. Mail to Charlie L. Jones (bgoo) |
| Filing 11 ***CASE MANAGEMENT TRANSFERRED to civil case manager for Judge Mary Geiger Lewis. Any future filings must be sent to the Clerk's Office at the following address: 901 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201. (bgoo) |
| Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that this matter be summarily dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Objections to R&R due by 11/6/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 10/23/2018. (bgoo) |
Filing 9
ORDER directing plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any address changes. Motion granted: #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 10/23/2018. (bgoo)
|
| Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Charlie L. Jones. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents) (bgoo) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Charlie L. Jones. Response to Motion due by 10/9/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents) Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett. (bgoo) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Charlie L. Jones. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Cover Letter) (bgoo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
