Segui v. Staffey et al
Nancy Segui |
Stephen Allen Staffey and V3 Transportation LLC. |
3:2018cv03274 |
December 5, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Stephen Allen Staffey, V3 Transportation LLC..(Bias, Joseph) |
Filing 16 TEXT ORDER: On January 15, 2019, the Clerk of Court informed Defendants their answers to the interrogatories required by Local Civil Rule 26.03 (answers) were past due and should be filed immediately. Yet, Defendants ignored the direction. Therefore, Defendants have until the end of business on January 23, 2019, to file their answers. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories due by 1/23/2019) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/22/2019. (cbru, ) |
Filing 15 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Nancy Segui.(Love-Sloan, Sabrina) |
Filing 14 Rule 26(f) Report by Stephen Allen Staffey, V3 Transportation LLC..(Bias, Joseph) |
Filing 13 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 11. Reason: Attorney refiled instead of submitting corrected document via email as directed. Corrected Filing Document Number #12 . Modified filing date to that of original filing: 1/08/2019. Response due date modified to that of original filing: N/A. (cbru, ) |
Filing 12 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Nancy Segui.(Love-Sloan, Sabrina) Modified to correct filing date on 1/9/2019 (cbru, ). |
Filing 10 TEXT ORDER: On December 21, 2018, the Clerk of Court filed a notice stating Plaintiff's "Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are to be filed... no later than January 4, 2019". Nevertheless, although that deadline has now passed, Plaintiff has still failed to file her answers. Therefore, not later than January 8, 2019, Plaintiff shall file her answers. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Answer to LR26.01 Interrogatories due by 1/8/2019) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/7/2019. (cbru, ) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiff is reminded that Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are to be filed no later than 14 days after service of the notice of removal. Please file these answers to interrogatories no later than January 4, 2019. (cbru, ) |
Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 12/10/2018. (cbru, ) |
Filing 6 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Report due by 1/14/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 2/5/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 3/7/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 4/8/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 4/8/2019, Discovery due by 6/5/2019, Motion in Limine due by 9/16/2019, Motions due by 6/20/2019, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 9/3/2019, Jury Selection Deadline 10/7/2019, Mediation Due by 8/19/2019. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 12/10/2018. (cbru, ) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Stephen Allen Staffey, V3 Transportation LLC..(Bias, Joseph) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Stephen Allen Staffey, V3 Transportation LLC.(cbru, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Richland County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2018-CP-40-05706 (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-8143387) filed by V3 Transportation LLC., Stephen Allen Staffey. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(cbru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.