Assa'ad-Faltas v. WalMart Company et al
| Marie Assa'ad-Faltas |
| Hewlett-Packard Company and WalMart Company |
| 3:2018cv03563 |
| December 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Terry L Wooten |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Marie Assa'ad-Faltas. Hewlett-Packard Company served on 2/14/2019, answer due 3/7/2019; WalMart Company served on 2/14/2019, answer due 3/7/2019. (lbak) |
| Filing 28 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 21 Reason: Filed erroneously by the Clerk's Office. (lbak) |
| Filing 26 Summons Issued as to Hewlett-Packard Company, WalMart Company. Service due by 5/13/2019. (lbak) |
| Filing 25 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #24 Order Service - Non-Inmate placed in U.S. Mail to Marie Assa'ad-Faltas. (lbak) |
Filing 24
ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk and directing plaintiff to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Motions granted: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access); #10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 2/11/2019. (lbak)
|
| Filing 22 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 20 Order placed in U.S. Mail to Marie Assa'ad-Faltas. (lbak) |
|
Filing 20
TEXT ORDER granting #17 MOTION for In Camera Review. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 2/7/2019. (lbak)
|
| Filing 17 MOTION for In Camera Review by Marie Assa'ad-Faltas. Response to Motion due by 2/21/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak) Modified on 2/8/2019 to correct motion relief. (lbak) |
| Filing 15 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #14 Proper Form Order, Summons and Forms USM-285 placed in U.S. Mail to Marie Assa'ad-Faltas. (lbak) |
|
Filing 14
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 2/8/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 1/18/2019. (lbak)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Marie Assa'ad-Faltas. Response to Motion due by 1/31/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak) |
| Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #8 Proper Form Order, IFP Application (AO239 Long Form), Summons and Forms USM-285 placed in U.S. Mail to Marie Assa'ad-Faltas. (lbak) |
|
Filing 8
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 1/17/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 12/27/2018. (lbak)
|
| Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Marie Assa'ad-Faltas. (lbak) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Marie Assa'ad-Faltas. Response to Motion due by 1/7/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hewlett-Packard Company, WalMart Company, filed by Marie Assa'ad-Faltas. (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
