Donald v. South Carolina Department of Probation Parole and Pardon Services et al
Amanda Donald |
Jerry Adger, Mike Nichols and South Carolina Department of Probation Parole and Pardon Services |
3:2019cv01045 |
April 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
J Michelle Childs |
Shiva V Hodges |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26 Report due by 5/14/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 7/9/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 8/8/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 9/9/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 9/9/2019, Discovery due by 11/6/2019, Motions due by 11/21/2019, ADR Statement due by 12/22/2019, Mediation Due by 1/21/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 4/10/2019. (lbak) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Jerry Adger, Mike Nichols, South Carolina Department of Probation Parole and Pardon Services.(Morgan, Richard) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Jerry Adger, Mike Nichols, South Carolina Department of Probation Parole and Pardon Services. (lbak) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County of Richland Court of Common Pleas, case number 2019-CP-40-01206. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8377138), filed by South Carolina Department of Probation Parole and Pardon Services, Jerry Adger, Mike Nichols. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents) (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.