Craps v. BI-LO, LLC
| Linda Rankin Craps |
| BI-LO, LLC |
| 3:2019cv01896 |
| July 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
CONSENT AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 12/19/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 1/6/2020, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 2/19/2020, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 2/4/2020, Discovery due by 4/30/2020, Motion in Limine due by 8/7/2020, Motions due by 5/15/2020, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 8/14/2020, Jury Selection Deadline 9/16/2020, Mediation Due by 6/30/2020. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 8/14/2019. (cbru, )
|
|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER: The parties have requested a scheduling conference with the Court. The request is DENIED. Accordingly, not later than August 14, 2019, counsel for the parties shall confer, draft, and submit to the Court a proposed consent scheduling order. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Proposed Order due by 8/14/2019) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 8/12/2019. (cbru, )
|
|
Filing 9
Joint Rule 26(f) Report and LR 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by BI-LO, LLC.(Holt, Ryan) Modified to edit text on 8/12/2019 (cbru, ).
|
|
Filing 8
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Linda Rankin Craps.(Morgan, Samuel)
|
|
Filing 6
MEDIATION ORDER. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 7/8/2019. (cbru, )
|
|
Filing 5
CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Report due by 8/12/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 9/3/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 10/1/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 10/31/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 10/31/2019, Discovery due by 12/30/2019, Motion in Limine due by 4/13/2020, Motions due by 1/14/2020, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 3/30/2020, Jury Selection Deadline 5/4/2020, Mediation Due by 3/16/2020. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 7/8/2019. (cbru, )
|
|
Filing 4
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by BI-LO, LLC.(cbru, ) (Main Document 4 replaced on 7/8/2019) (cbru, ).
|
|
Filing 3
ANSWER to Complaint by BI-LO, LLC.(cbru, )
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Lexington County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2019-CP-32-02213 (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-8539037) filed by BI-LO, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit 1 - Email re: Amount in Controversy)(cbru, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Craps v. BI-LO, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Linda Rankin Craps | |
| Represented By: | Samuel Kirkpatrick Morgan, Jr |
| Represented By: | Charles Thomas Slaughter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BI-LO, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Charles Holt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
