Pollard v. Campbell et al
Plaintiff: Parrish Rayquan Pollard
Defendant: James C. Campbell and Bryan Keith Griffin
Case Number: 3:2019cv02992
Filed: October 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Paige J Gossett
Referring Judge: Mary Geiger Lewis
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2019 Filing 14 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #12 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation, #13 Judgment placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Parrish Rayquan Pollard, 26625, Sumter Lee Regional Detention Center, 1250 Winkles Road, Sumter, SC 29153 (bgoo)
December 16, 2019 Filing 13 JUDGMENT dismissing the action with prejudice. (bgoo)
December 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER adopting the #8 Report and Recommendation and dismissing the complaint with prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 12/16/2019. (bgoo)
December 2, 2019 Filing 9 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED: #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #7 Order to Notify of Address Change, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Parrish Rayquan Pollard 26625 Sumter Lee Regional Detention Center 1250 Winkles Road Sumter, SC 29153 (jpet, )
November 26, 2019 Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending the #1 Complaint be dismissed with prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 12/10/2019 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 11/26/2019. (jpet, )
November 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER directing plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any address changes, granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) filed by Parrish Rayquan Pollard. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 11/26/2019. (jpet, )
October 22, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Parrish Rayquan Pollard. Response to Motion due by 11/5/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett. (bgoo)
October 22, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Parrish Rayquan Pollard. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (bgoo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pollard v. Campbell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James C. Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bryan Keith Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Parrish Rayquan Pollard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?