Parker v. Syneos Health Inc
Tamekia L Parker |
Syneos Health Inc |
3:2019cv03490 |
December 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
J Michelle Childs |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 TEXT ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response to Motion due by 2/17/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 1/29/2020.(asni, ) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 Motion to Dismiss by Tamekia L Parker. Response to Motion due by 2/12/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Goodwyn, Thomas) (Main Document 10 replaced on 1/29/2020) (asni, ). Modified to replace document to correct attorney s/signature on 1/29/2020 (asni, ). |
Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Syneos Health Inc. Response to Motion due by 1/27/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Dixon, Joshua) |
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Syneos Health Inc answer due 1/13/2020. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 12/23/2019.(asni, ) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Syneos Health Inc. Response to Motion due by 1/6/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order for Extension of Time)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Dixon, Joshua) |
Filing 4 Plaintiff's Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Tamekia L Parker.(Goodwyn, Thomas) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Syneos Health Inc.(bshr, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Richland County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2019-CP-40-6347. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8830202), filed by Syneos Health Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Certificate of Service)(bshr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Parker v. Syneos Health Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Syneos Health Inc | |
Represented By: | Victoria Therese Kepes |
Represented By: | Joshua Wallace Dixon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tamekia L Parker | |
Represented By: | Thomas Jefferson Goodwyn, Jr |
Represented By: | Coy David Beale, Jr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.