Williams et al v. Stevens Transport TL, Inc. et al
Reginald Williams and Dolores Hubbard |
Stevens Transport TL, Inc., John Doe and Paragon Leasing, LP |
3:2020cv01436 |
April 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
Sherri A Lydon |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Plaintiffs' 26(a)(1) disclosures Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Dolores Hubbard, Reginald Williams.(Lynn, Sydney) |
Filing 15 Plaintiffs' Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Dolores Hubbard, Reginald Williams.(Lynn, Sydney) |
Filing 14 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by John Doe, Paragon Leasing, LP, Stevens Transport TL, Inc..(Moseley, Robert) |
Filing 13 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by John Doe, Paragon Leasing, LP, Stevens Transport TL, Inc..(Moseley, Robert) |
Filing 12 Case Reassigned to Judge Sherri A Lydon. Judge Mary Geiger Lewis no longer assigned to the case. (suro) |
Filing 11 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by John Doe.(Moseley, Robert) Modified to edit text on 5/4/2020 (cbru, ). |
Filing 10 TEXT ORDER: On April 15, 2020, the Clerk reminded Defendant John Doe that "Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are to be filed at the time a party first appears". The Clerk requested that Defendant John Doe "file these answers to interrogatories no later than April 29, 2020". Nevertheless, the deadline has passed and Defendant John Doe has failed to do so. Therefore, not later than the close of business on May 1, 2020, the Court directs Defendant John Doe to file said answers. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Answer to LR26.01 Interrogatories due by 5/1/2020) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 4/30/2020. (cbru, ) Modified to edit text on 4/30/2020 (cbru, ). |
Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 4/27/2020. (cbru, ) |
Filing 8 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Report due by 6/1/2020, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 6/26/2020, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 7/27/2020, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 8/25/2020, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 8/25/2020, Discovery due by 10/26/2020, Motion in Limine due by 2/8/2021, Motions due by 11/9/2020, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 1/22/2021, Jury Selection Deadline 3/1/2021, Mediation Due by 1/7/2021. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 4/27/2020. (cbru, ) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by John Doe, Paragon Leasing, LP, Stevens Transport TL, Inc..(Moseley, Robert) |
Filing 6 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Lee County. (Attachments: #1 Acknowledgement by State Clerk)(Moseley, Robert) Modified to edit text on 4/20/2020 (cbru, ). |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE: Defendant John Doe is reminded that Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are to be filed at the time a party first appears. Please file these answers to interrogatories no later than April 29, 2020. (cbru, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Paragon Leasing, LP, Stevens Transport TL, Inc.(cbru, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Lee County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020-CP-31-00095 (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-9053198) filed by Paragon Leasing, LP, John Doe, Stevens Transport TL, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(cbru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.