Jordan v. Krajack
| Timothy Jordan |
| Dana Krajack |
| 3:2020cv02906 |
| August 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Withdraw #1 Complaint by Timothy Jordan. Response to Motion due by 9/30/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.(cbru, ) |
| Filing 14 ***CASE MANAGEMENT TRANSFERRED to civil case manager for Judge Mary Geiger Lewis. Any future filings must be sent to the Clerk's Office at the following address: 901 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201. (lbak) |
| Filing 13 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #11 Order to Notify of Address Change, #12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and 14 CASE MANAGEMENT TRANSFERRED placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Timothy Jordan, 104 Woodglen Lane, Chapin, SC 29036. (lbak) Modified on 9/9/2020 to edit text. (lbak) |
| Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that the #1 Complaint be summarily dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 9/23/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 9/9/2020. (lbak) |
Filing 11
ORDER directing plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any address changes. Motion granted: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Motion denied: #6 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 9/8/2020. (lbak)
|
| Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Timothy Jordan. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (mmcd) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Timothy Jordan. Response to Motion due by 8/28/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett. (mmcd) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Timothy Jordan. Response to Motion due by 8/24/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett. (mmcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dana Krajack, filed by Timothy Jordan. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (mmcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jordan v. Krajack | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Timothy Jordan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dana Krajack | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
