Johnson v. W.S. Badcock Corporation
David V. Johnson |
Equifax Information Service, LLC and W.S. Badcock Corporation |
3:2020cv03438 |
September 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 11/23/2020. (cbru, ) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Settlement and Request to Enter Rubin Order as to Badcock Corporation, Only by David V. Johnson (Maxfield, David) |
Filing 15 ORDER DISMISSING CASE as to Equifax Information Service, LLC without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 10/26/2020. (cbru, ) |
Filing 14 TEXT ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (W.S. Badcock Corporation answer due 11/23/2020) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 10/26/2020.(cbru, ) |
Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal by W.S. Badcock Corporation. Response to Motion due by 11/9/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Nichols, Kristen) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement and Request to Enter Rubin Order as to Equifax Information Services, LLC, Only by David V. Johnson (Maxfield, David) |
Filing 10 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by W.S. Badcock Corporation. W.S. Badcock Corporation served on 10/12/2020, answer due 11/2/2020. (Nichols, Kristen) |
Filing 9 REPLY by Equifax Information Service, LLC to 4 Order,,, Set Deadlines,, . (Barker, Rita) |
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (Equifax Information Service, LLC answer due 10/26/2020) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 10/2/2020.(cbru, ) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint by Equifax Information Service, LLC. Response to Motion due by 10/16/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Barker, Rita) |
Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by David V. Johnson.(Maxfield, David) |
Filing 4 TEXT ORDER: The parties' attention is directed to the Court's Standing Order Regarding All Removed Cases Assigned to Judge Mary Geiger Lewis, located on the District Court's website at https://www.scd.uscourts.gov/Forms/Special_Instructions/Lewis_Standing%20_Order_Regarding_Removed_Cases.pdf. Not later than seven days from the entry of this Text Order, Defendant(s) shall file the information mandated by the Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Reply due by 10/6/2020) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 9/29/2020. (cbru, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Equifax Information Service, LLC.(cbru, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Richland County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020-CP-40-03959 (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-9371501) filed by Equifax Information Service, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents)(cbru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.