Dunbar v. ABB Motors and Mechanical Inc. et al
James Dunbar |
Howden North America Inc., Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. A Delaware Corporation doing business as Ingalls Shipbuilding formerly known as Northrop Grumman Ship Systems formerly known as Ingalls Shipbuilding, a division of Litton Systems, Inc., Velan Valve Corp., ITT Inc., Cameron International Corporation, Borgwarner Inc., Elliott Company, ViacomCBS Inc., Viad Corp, Weir Valves & Controls USA, Inc., Goulds Pumps, Incorporated, Foster Wheeler Energy Coporation, Alfa Laval, Inc., Spirax Sarco, Inc., ABB Motors and Mechanical Inc., Borg-Warner Corporation, Robertshaw Controls Company A Delaware Corporation doing business as Fulton Sylphon Valves, Crane Environmental, Inc., Ingalls Shipbuilding, a division of Litton Systems, Inc., Crane Co., Gardner Denver, Inc., Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Davis Engineering Company) A Delaware Corporation doing business as Cleaver-Brooks Division Successor in Interest Davis Engineering Company, ITT Industries, Inc., William Powell Company, The, Elliott Turbomachinery Company, Prudential Insurance Company of America, The, Blackmer Pump Company, McNally Industries, LLC, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Emerson Electric Company, Jenkins Bros. sued individually and as successor to and d/b/a Jenkins Valve Corp.; A Massachusetts Corporation Successor in Interest Jenkins Valve Corp., SPX Corporation, General Electric Company, Pfizer Inc., Copes-Vulcan, Inc., Aurora Pump Company, Dial Corporation, The, ITT Goulds Pumps, Inc., Carrier Corporation, Howden Buffalo Inc., Cooper Cameron Corporation, CBS Corporation (a Delaware Corporation), Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Armstrong International, Inc., Atwood & Morrill, Hopeman Brothers Inc., Rockwell Automation, Inc., Viad Corporation, Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Henry Technologies, Inc., Jerguson Gage & Valve Company A Delaware Corporation doing business as Clark Reliance Corporation, Carrier Global Corporation, Flowserve US, Inc., Olson Technologies Inc., Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, FMC Corporation, ITT Corporation, Soft Sheen * Carson (W.I.), Inc., Superior-Lidgerwood-Mundy Corporation, Warren Pumps, LLC, Nash Engineering Company, The, Velan Valve Corporation, Union Carbide Corporation, Ruggles-Klingemann Mfg. Co., Taco, Inc. and IMO Industries, Inc. |
3:2020cv04069 |
November 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
P.I. : Asbestos |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 ***DOCUMENT E-MAILED 48 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court to Richland County Court of Common Pleas, ***DOCUMENT MAILED 48 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to The Honorable Jeanette W. McBride, Clerk, Richland County Court of Common Pleas, PO Box 2766, Columbia, SC 29202-2766 (cbru, ) |
Filing 48 TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 12/22/2020. Clerk's Notice: Attorneys are responsible for supplementing the State Record with all documents filed in Federal Court. (cbru, ) |
Filing 46 CLERK'S NOTICE: Defendant Soft Sheen Carson (W.I.), Inc. is reminded that Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are to be filed at the time a party first appears. Please file these answers to interrogatories no later than January 4, 2021. (cbru, ) |
Filing 44 ANSWER to Complaint by Soft Sheen Carson (W.I.), Inc.(McCool, Deirdre) Modified to edit text on 12/21/2020 (cbru, ). |
Filing 43 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Henry Technologies, Inc..(Shofner, Erin) |
Filing 42 TEXT ORDER: On November 30, 2020, the Clerk reminded Defendant Henry Technologies, Inc. ("Henry") that "Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are to be filed at the time a party first appears". The Clerk requested that Henry "file these answers to interrogatories no later than December 14, 2020". Nevertheless, the deadline has passed and Henry has failed to do so. Therefore, not later than the close of business on December 16, 2020, the Court directs Henry to file said answers. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Answer to LR26.01 Interrogatories due by 12/16/2020) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 12/15/2020. (cbru, ) |
Filing 40 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiff is reminded that Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are to be filed no later than 14 days after service of the notice of removal. Please file these answers to interrogatories no later than December 23, 2020. (cbru, ) |
Filing 39 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Union Carbide Corporation.(Frick, Scott) |
Filing 38 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by McNally Industries, LLC.(Frick, Scott) |
Filing 37 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by FMC Corporation.(Frick, Scott) |
Filing 36 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Cyprus Amax Minerals Company.(Frick, Scott) |
Filing 34 Withdrawal of Motions: #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Henry Technologies, Inc. Filing corrected for event type (cbru, ) |
Filing 33 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott E Frick on behalf of Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, FMC Corporation, McNally Industries, LLC, Union Carbide Corporation (Frick, Scott) |
Filing 32 NOTICE of Appearance by Moffatt Grier McDonald on behalf of Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, FMC Corporation, McNally Industries, LLC, Union Carbide Corporation (McDonald, Moffatt) |
Filing 31 NOTICE of Appearance by William David Conner on behalf of Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, FMC Corporation, McNally Industries, LLC, Union Carbide Corporation (Conner, William) |
Filing 29 Deficiency Notification (Prior notifications sent via e-mail) In Re Document Number:9. Docket Correction due 12/7/2020. Any response due is based on the filing date of the original document. (cbru, ) |
Filing 28 REPLY by Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. to 4 Order,,, Set Deadlines,, . (O'Neill, M) |
Filing 27 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 15, 16. Reason: Incorrect attorney log in used. Corrected Filing Document Number #25 , #26 . Modified filing date to that of original filing: 12/01/2020. Response due date modified to that of original filing: N/A. (cbru, ) |
Filing 26 ANSWER to Complaint by Jerguson Gage & Valve Company.(Techman, Jennifer) Modified to correct filing date on 12/2/2020 (cbru, ). |
Filing 25 ANSWER to Complaint by Copes-Vulcan, Inc. Techman, Jennifer) Modified to correct filing date on 12/2/2020 (cbru, ). |
Filing 24 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Copes-Vulcan, Inc..(Techman, Jennifer) |
Filing 23 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Jerguson Gage & Valve Company.(Techman, Jennifer) |
Filing 22 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Spirax Sarco, Inc..(Techman, Jennifer) |
Filing 21 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by General Electric Company.(Techman, Jennifer) |
Filing 20 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Copes-Vulcan, Inc.. (Techman, Jennifer) |
Filing 19 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Jerguson Gage & Valve Company. (Techman, Jennifer) |
Filing 18 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Spirax Sarco, Inc.. (Techman, Jennifer) |
Filing 17 Corporate Disclosure Statement by General Electric Company. (Techman, Jennifer) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint by Spirax Sarco, Inc..(Techman, Jennifer) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint by General Electric Company.(Techman, Jennifer) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint by Cleaver-Brooks, Inc..(O'Neill, M) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE: Defendant Henry Technologies, Inc. is reminded that Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are to be filed at the time a party first appears. Please file these answers to interrogatories no later than December 14, 2020. (cbru, ) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Henry Technologies, Inc.. Response to Motion due by 12/9/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Shofner, Erin) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Henry Technologies, Inc..(Shofner, Erin) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin Elaine Shofner on behalf of Henry Technologies, Inc., Taco, Inc. (Shofner, Erin) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION to Remand to State Court by James Dunbar. Response to Motion due by 12/9/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)No proposed order.(McVey, Theile) Modified to edit text on 11/30/2020 (cbru, ). |
Filing 4 TEXT ORDER: The parties' attention is directed to the Court's Standing Order Regarding All Removed Cases Assigned to Judge Mary Geiger Lewis, located on the District Court's website at https://www.scd.uscourts.gov/Forms/Special_Instructions/Lewis_Standing%20_Order_Regarding_Removed_Cases.pdf. Not later than seven days from the entry of this Text Order, Defendant(s) shall file the information mandated by the Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Reply due by 12/1/2020) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 11/24/2020. (cbru, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.(cbru, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Richland County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020-CP-40-04911 (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-9489852) filed by Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleading)(cbru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.