United States of America v. 60000.00 Dollars in US Currency
| United States of America |
| 60000.00 Dollars in US Currency |
| Miguel Angel Ramos |
| 3:2020cv04300 |
| December 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| J Michelle Childs |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Miguel Angel Ramos re #8 Answer to Complaint For Forfeiture In REM (Bannister, James) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint for Forfeiture in REM by Miguel Angel Ramos.(Bannister, James) |
| Filing 7 CLAIM Claim Asserting Interest in Defendant Currency by Marcelo Torricos, Jim Bannister. (Bannister, James) (Main Document 7 replaced on 1/12/2021) (asni, ). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Judicial Forfeiture Action by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Sherard, Carrie) |
| Filing 5 WARRANT Returned Executed as to $60,000 in United States Currency. (Attachments: #1 Executed Warrant)(Sherard, Carrie) Modified to edit text on 12/21/2020 (cbru, ). |
| Filing 3 WARRANT IN REM ISSUED (asni, ) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION FOR WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM by United States of America. (asni, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 60000.00 Dollars in US Currency, filed by United States of America. Service due by 3/11/2021 (Attachments: #1 verification)(asni, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
