Shulman v. Lendmark Financial
| Boris Shulman |
| Lendmark Financial |
| 3:2021cv01887 |
| June 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
***DOCUMENT MAILED #18 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Motion to Amend/Correct placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Boris Shulman, 500 Great North Road, Columbia, SC 29223. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #14 Motion to Amend and denying as moot Defendant's #11 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is directed to file an amended complaint no later than August 27, 2021. (Specific document due 8/27/2021). Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 8/9/2021. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 17
REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by Lendmark Financial. (Robertson, George)
|
|
Filing 16
RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Amend/Correct Response filed by Lendmark Financial.Reply to Response to Motion due by 8/4/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Robertson, George)
|
|
Filing 15
RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by Boris Shulman.Reply to Response to Motion due by 7/28/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope) (mmcd)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to Amend/Correct by Boris Shulman. Response to Motion due by 7/28/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Order from District Court, #2 Exhibit 2 - Certified mail reciept, #3 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 13
***DOCUMENT MAILED #12 Roseboro Order placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Boris Shulman, 500 Great North Road, Columbia, SC 29223. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 12
ROSEBORO ORDER directing clerk to forward explanation of dismissal procedures to the opposing party and directing that party to respond in 31 days. Response due to #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. Response to Motion due by 8/13/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 7/13/2021. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Lendmark Financial. Response to Motion due by 7/26/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.Motions referred to Shiva V Hodges.(Robertson, George)
|
|
Filing 10
***DOCUMENT MAILED #9 Order to Notify of Address Change placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Boris Shulman, 500 Great North Road, Columbia, SC 29223. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER directing plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any address changes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 6/30/2021. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 8
***DOCUMENT MAILED 7 Text Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Boris Shulman, 500 Great North Road, Columbia, SC 29223. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File answer or otherwise plead. Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise plead is now July 12, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 6/25/21.(vhor, )
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint by Lendmark Financial. Response to Motion due by 7/9/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.Motions referred to Shiva V Hodges.(Robertson, George)
|
|
Filing 5
REPLY by Lendmark Financial to Standing Order. (Robertson, George)
|
|
Filing 3
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Lendmark Financial. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County of Richland Magistrate's Court, case number 2021-CV-4010400949. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9915666), filed by Lendmark Financial. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (lbak)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shulman v. Lendmark Financial | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Boris Shulman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lendmark Financial | |
| Represented By: | George G Robertson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
