Taylor-White v. South Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation Department
Tawanda Taylor-White |
South Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation Department |
3:2021cv01902 |
June 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
J Michelle Childs |
Paige J Gossett |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Request for Protection from Court Appearance by Shannon Polvi for 9/20/21- 9/24/21 10/28/21-10/29/21 11/29/21-12/6/21 (Polvi, Shannon) Modified on 8/4/2021 to edit docket text (mmcd). |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Confidentiality Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 7/26/2021. (lbak) |
Filing 11 Joint MOTION for Confidentiality Order by Tawanda Taylor-White. Response to Motion due by 8/4/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.Motions referred to Paige J Gossett.(Polvi, Shannon) |
Filing 10 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Tawanda Taylor-White.(Polvi, Shannon) |
Filing 9 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by South Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation Department.(Morgan, Richard) |
Filing 8 Joint Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by South Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation Department.(Morgan, Richard) |
Filing 7 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by South Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation Department.(Morgan, Richard) |
Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Tawanda Taylor-White.(Polvi, Shannon) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26 Report due by 7/28/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 9/22/2021, Discovery due by 1/12/2022, Motions due by 1/26/2022, and Mediation Due by 3/23/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 6/24/2021. (mmcd) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by South Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation Department.(Morgan, Richard) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by South Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation Department. (mmcd) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Richland County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-40-02386. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9919780), filed by South Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation Department. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents) (mmcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Taylor-White v. South Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation Department | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: South Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation Department | |
Represented By: | Richard J Morgan |
Represented By: | Shannon Polvi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tawanda Taylor-White | |
Represented By: | Shannon Polvi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.