Caughman v. Atrium Finance I LP et al
Crystal Caughman |
Atrium Finance I LP, Atrium Hospitality LP and Charles Johnson |
3:2021cv03107 |
September 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Terry L Wooten |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 MOTION to Remand Response filed by Crystal Caughman. (re-filed by the Clerk to correct event) (kbos) |
Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Response filed by Charles Johnson. (Fulton, Elizabeth) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Remand Response filed by Atrium Finance I LP, Atrium Hospitality LP, Charles Johnson.Reply to Response to Motion due by 11/12/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of Charles Johnson, #2 Exhibit Affidavit of Peter Komar, #3 Exhibit Affidavit of Norman Bates, #4 Exhibit Picture of Hotel Interior)(Fulton, Elizabeth) |
Filing 14 TEXT ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #5 MOTION to Dismiss, Replies due by 11/5/2021. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on October 28, 2021.(kbos) |
Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #12 Response in Opposition to Motion, by Charles Johnson. Response to Motion due by 11/9/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Fuerst, Daniel) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Response filed by Crystal Caughman.Reply to Response to Motion due by 10/29/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Griffin, James) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Remand by Crystal Caughman. Response to Motion due by 11/4/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Crystal Caughman, #2 Exhibit B - Case Clearance Narrative)No proposed order.(Griffin, James) |
Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Crystal Caughman.(Fox, Margaret) |
Filing 9 TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #5 MOTION to Dismiss, Response to Motion due by 10/22/2021. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on October 7, 2021.(kbos) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss by Crystal Caughman. Response to Motion due by 10/20/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Griffin, James) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Charles Johnson. (kbos) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Atrium Finance I LP, Atrium Hospitality LP. (kbos) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Charles Johnson. Response to Motion due by 10/8/2021. (kbos) |
Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Charles Johnson.(kbos) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Atrium Finance I LP, Atrium Hospitality LP.(kbos) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of CommonPleas Richland County, case number 2021-CP-40-4365. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-10093026), filed by Atrium Hospitality LP, Atrium Finance I LP, Charles Johnson. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(kbos) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.