Independent Savings Plan Company, The v. Manueles
| The Independent Savings Plan Company doing business as ISPC and Independent Savings Plan Company, The doing business as ISPC |
| Margaret D. Manueles |
| 3:2021cv03965 |
| December 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Paige J Gossett |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 16 Transfer of Case Management placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Margaret D. Manueles, 1145 Wylie Street, Camden, SC 29020. (dist) |
| Filing 16 ***CASE MANAGEMENT TRANSFERRED to civil case manager for Judge Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis. Any future filings must be sent to the Clerk's Office at the following address: 901 Richland Street, Columbia, SC 29201. (dist) |
| Filing 15 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 14 Clerk's Notice, #13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #9 MOTION to Remand placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Margaret D. Manueles, 1145 Wylie Street, Camden, SC 29020. (dist) |
| Filing 14 Clerk's Notice: #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis addressed in #13 . (dist) |
Filing 13
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that ISPC's motion to remand be granted (ECF no. 9), and that this case be remanded to the Kershaw County Magistrate's Court. (Objections to R&R due by 2/14/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 1/31/2022. (dist)
|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Independent Savings Plan Company, The re #8 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories (von Keller, Theodore) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Independent Savings Plan Company, The re #9 MOTION to Remand and Memorandum of Authorities in Support of Motion to Remand (von Keller, Theodore) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand by Independent Savings Plan Company, The. Response to Motion due by 1/18/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Paige J Gossett.(von Keller, Theodore) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/5/2022: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit Contract, #3 Exhibit NOD, #4 Exhibit Complaint, #5 Exhibit Summons, #6 Exhibit Affidavit of Service, #7 Exhibit Answer, #8 Exhibit Hearing Summons, #9 Exhibit Notice of Removal) (dist, ). Modified on 1/5/2022 to add to main document attachments that were filed separately and to add exhibit descriptions provided by the filing user. (dist) |
| Filing 8 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Independent Savings Plan Company, The.(von Keller, Theodore) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Margaret D. Manueles. Response to Motion due by 12/21/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett. (dist) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Margaret D. Manueles. (dist) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Magistrate's Court of Kershaw County, case number 2021CV2810100787 filed by Margaret D. Manueles. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(dist) Modified on 12/8/2021 (dist, ). Modified on 12/8/2021 to correct filing date. (dist) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
