Jenkins v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina
Plaintiff: Anansa Jenkins
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield Of South Carolina doing business as Palmetto GBA, LLC,
Case Number: 3:2022cv00289
Filed: January 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: J Michelle Childs
Referring Judge: Paige J Gossett
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/29/2022, Discovery due by 8/19/2022, Motions due by 9/30/2022, Mediation Due by 10/28/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 3/11/2022. (dist)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Blue Cross Blue Shield Of South Carolina.(Haselden, Thomas)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Anansa Jenkins.(Polvi, Shannon)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Joint Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Blue Cross Blue Shield Of South Carolina.(Haselden, Thomas)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Blue Cross Blue Shield Of South Carolina.(Haselden, Thomas)
March 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Request for Protection from Court Appearance by Christopher W Johnson for April 8-18, 2022 (Johnson, Christopher)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Anansa Jenkins.(Polvi, Shannon)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26 Report due by 3/8/2022, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/29/2022, Discovery due by 8/19/2022, Motions due by 9/2/2022, Mediation Due by 10/28/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 1/31/2022. (dist)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina. (dist) Modified on 1/31/2022 to correct docket text (dist) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/31/2022: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Charges of Discrimination) (dist)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina. (dist)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402 ), filed by Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents.(dist) Modified on 1/31/2022 to remove document attached in error. (dist)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jenkins v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anansa Jenkins
Represented By: Shannon Polvi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield Of South Carolina doing business as Palmetto GBA, LLC,
Represented By: Christopher W Johnson
Represented By: Thomas Foster Haselden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?