Semones v. WPS, Inc. d/b/a Honda of Columbia
| P. Allen Semones |
| WPS, Inc. d/b/a Honda of Columbia and WPS, Inc. doing business as Honda of Columbia |
| 3:2022cv01009 |
| March 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 5/25/2022. (cbru, )
|
| Filing 7 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER Entry #5 Reason: to correct filing error. Corrected Filing Document Number #6 (dsto, ) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE by P. Allen Semones. (Attachments: #1 Executed Waiver of the Service of Summons)(Gantt-Sorenson, Christine) Modified on 4/20/2022 to correct filing date. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to WPS, Inc. d/b/a Honda of Columbia. Service due by 6/28/2022. (dsto, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories with jury demand by P. Allen Semones.(dsto, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WPS, Inc. d/b/a Honda of Columbia (Filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-10417607), filed by P. Allen Semones. Service due by 6/28/2022.(dsto, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
