Gregg v. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics et al
Anthony Gregg |
American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Foundation, The, Marc Williams and Maximilian Muenke |
3:2022cv01218 |
April 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Maximilian Muenke. (cbru, ) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Marc Williams. (cbru, ) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Foundation, The. (cbru, ) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. (cbru, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Anthony Gregg.(cbru, ) (Main Document 3 replaced on 4/15/2022) (cbru, ). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (Filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-10442432) filed by Anthony Gregg. Service due by 7/13/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Career Screening Article, #2 Exhibit B - Message from ACMG President, #3 Exhibit C - April 19, 2021 Press Release, #4 Exhibit D - Bylaws of ACMG)(cbru, ) (Main Document 1 replaced on 4/15/2022) (cbru, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.