Dick Smith Motors, Inc. v. Nissan North America, Inc.
| Dick Smith Motors, Inc. doing business as Dick Smith Nissan |
| Nissan North America, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv01332 |
| April 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Nissan North America, Inc.. Response to Motion due by 7/8/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Genovese, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Report due by 6/29/2022, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 8/24/2022, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 9/21/2022, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 10/19/2022, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 10/19/2022, Discovery due by 12/14/2022, Motion in Limine due by 4/17/2023, Motions due by 12/28/2022, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 3/8/2023, Jury Selection Deadline 5/8/2023, ADR Statement due by 1/25/2023, Mediation Due by 2/22/2023. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 5/25/2022. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Nissan North America, Inc..(Genovese, Christopher) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Nissan North America, Inc..(Genovese, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 5. Reason: Attorney refiled instead of submitting corrected document via email as directed. Corrected Filing Document Number #7 . Modified filing date to that of original filing: 5/09/2022. Response due date modified to that of original filing: N/A. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 7 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by Nissan North America, Inc. Nissan North America, Inc. served on 5/4/2022, answer due 5/25/2022. (Hutto, S) Modified to correct filing date and to edit text on 5/10/2022 (cbru, ). |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Nissan North America, Inc. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Dick Smith Motors, Inc.(cbru, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nissan North America, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-10461363) filed by Dick Smith Motors, Inc. Service due by 7/25/2022(cbru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dick Smith Motors, Inc. v. Nissan North America, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dick Smith Motors, Inc. doing business as Dick Smith Nissan | |
| Represented By: | Harry Clayton Walker, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Christopher C Genovese |
| Represented By: | S Keith Hutto |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
