Hawkins v. Bayview Loan Servicing et al
| Johnny Mack Hawkins |
| Bayview Loan Servicing and Citifinancial Servicing |
| 3:2022cv01750 |
| June 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Sherri A Lydon |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 REPLY by Johnny Mack Hawkins to #5 Order. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents) (lbak) |
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #4 Proper Form Order, #5 Order and one Summons placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Johnny Mack Hawkins, 118 Cardamon Court, Columbia, SC 29203. (lbak) Modified on 6/10/2022 to edit docket text. (lbak) |
Filing 5
ORDER directing Plaintiff to answer the attached special interrogatories within 21 days from the date of this order. Plaintiff's answers should be filed with this court. (Specific Document due by 6/29/2022.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 6/8/2022. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 4
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 6/29/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 6/8/2022. (lbak)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number SCX300099343.), filed by Johnny Mack Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Notary Jurat)(dist) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
