Garrick v. Austin et al
Plaintiff: Deborah Garrick and Deborah L. Garrick
Defendant: Lloyd J. Austin, III, Brian Dula, Calvin Moxley, Alexia Pamplin, Brian Dual, Lloyd J. Austin, 111 and Dr. Raymond Burk
Case Number: 3:2022cv02332
Filed: July 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Paige J Gossett
Referring Judge: Sherri A Lydon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2022 Filing 15 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Deborah Garrick. (lbak)
September 13, 2022 Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Calvin Moxley, Lloyd J. Austin, 111, Brian Dual, Alexia Pamplin, Raymond Burk, filed by Deborah Garrick. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Affidavit of Frank Morant, #3 Affidavit of Carlos Garrick) (lbak)
August 17, 2022 Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Order, #8 Proper Form Order, one blank Summons, six blank USM forms, one blank 26.01 form, 9 Clerk's Notice placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Deborah Garrick, 126 Valley Down Road, Gadsden, SC 29052. (dist)
August 17, 2022 Filing 9 Clerk's Notice: #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel addressed in #8 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 8/16/2022.(dist)
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 9/7/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 8/16/2022. (dist)
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REGARDING AMENDMENT OF COMPLAINT granting Plaintiff twenty-one (21) days from the date this order is entered (plus three days for mail time) to file an amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) that corrects the deficiencies identified in this order. (Amended Complaint due by 9/7/2022.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 8/16/2022. (dist)
July 20, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Deborah Garrick. Response to Motion due by 8/3/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(dist)
July 20, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Deborah Garrick. Response to Motion due by 8/3/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Paige J. Gossett.(dist)
July 20, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Deborah Garrick. (dist)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garrick v. Austin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah Garrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah L. Garrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lloyd J. Austin, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Dula
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Calvin Moxley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alexia Pamplin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Dual
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lloyd J. Austin, 111
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Raymond Burk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?