Taylor v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
| Matthew C Taylor |
| Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
| 3:2022cv02893 |
| August 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Sherri A Lydon |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 10/3/2022, Rule 26 Report due by 10/17/2022, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 1/27/2023, Plaintiff's ID of Expert Witness due by 2/20/2023, Defendant's ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 3/22/2023, Discovery due by 5/12/2023, Motions due by 5/26/2023, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 7/19/2023, case to be called for trial during the October 2023 term, and Mediation Due by 6/9/2023. Signed by the Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on October 18, 2022. (ahil) |
| Filing 10 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Matthew C Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hawkins, Daryl) |
| Filing 9 Joint Report Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Matthew C Taylor.(Hawkins, Daryl) |
| Filing 8 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 10/3/2022, Rule 26 Report due by 10/17/2022, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 11/28/2022, Plaintiff's ID of Expert Witness due by 12/21/2022, Defendant's ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 1/20/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 2/9/2023, Discovery due by 3/13/2023, Motion in Limine due by 3/10/2023, Motions due by 3/27/2023, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 5/19/2023, Jury Selection Deadline 8/3/2023, Mediation Due by 4/10/2023, Signed by the Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on September 12, 2022. (ahil) |
| Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Wray, Ronald) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Wray, Ronald) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Matthew C Taylor. Original was deleted and refiled by Clerk to correct filing event. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(ahil) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (ahil) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Matthew C Taylor.(ahil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Norfolk Southern Railway Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10673631.), filed by Matthew C Taylor. Service due by 11/28/2022.(ahil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Taylor v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matthew C Taylor | |
| Represented By: | Daryl G Hawkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company | |
| Represented By: | Ronald K Wray, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
