Jaeger et al v. Jaeger et al
Plaintiff: Andrew Jaeger and SLP Advisory LLP
Defendant: Abigail Jaeger, Brittany T Kaliher, Beam Technologies LLC, John Does 1-10 and Jane Does 1-10
Counter Claimant: Andrew Patterson
Case Number: 3:2022cv04615
Filed: December 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Sherri A Lydon
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2023 Filing 21 RESPONSE in Opposition re #19 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaims Response filed by Beam Technologies LLC, Andrew Patterson.Reply to Response to Motion due by 2/22/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Babb, Julius)
February 2, 2023 Filing 20 Joint Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Andrew Jaeger, SLP Advisory LLP.(Matthews, Steve)
February 1, 2023 Filing 19 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaims by Andrew Jaeger, SLP Advisory LLP. Response to Motion due by 2/15/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)No proposed order.(Matthews, Steve)
February 1, 2023 Filing 18 Joint MOTION for Confidentiality Order by Andrew Jaeger, SLP Advisory LLP. Response to Motion due by 2/15/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)No proposed order.(Matthews, Steve)
February 1, 2023 Filing 17 Joint Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Andrew Jaeger, SLP Advisory LLP.(Matthews, Steve) Modified on 2/1/2023 to remove the proposed order so as to be in filing compliance (ahil).
February 1, 2023 Filing 16 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Andrew Jaeger, SLP Advisory LLP. (Matthews, Steve) Modified on 2/1/2023 to remove the proposed order so as to be in filing compliance (ahil).
January 23, 2023 Filing 15 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by SLP Advisory LLP.(Matthews, Steve)
January 23, 2023 Filing 14 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Andrew Jaeger.(Matthews, Steve)
January 17, 2023 Filing 13 TEXT ORDER granting #12 Motion for Gregory Zimmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Andrew Jaeger and SLP Advisory, LLP. Signed by the Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on January 17, 2023.(ahil)
January 17, 2023 Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Gregory Zimmer ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10895620) by Andrew Jaeger, SLP Advisory LLP. Response to Motion due by 1/31/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents Affidavit/Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission)No proposed order.(Matthews, Steve)
January 4, 2023 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs by Beam Technologies LLC, Andrew Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Managed Services Contract)(Babb, Julius)
December 29, 2022 Filing 10 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 1/18/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 2/1/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 3/14/2023, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 4/10/2023, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 5/8/2023, Discovery due by 6/27/2023, Motions due by 7/11/2023, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 9/5/2023, case to be called for trial during the September 2023 term of court, and Mediation Due by 7/25/2023. Signed by the Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on December 29, 2022. (ahil)
December 28, 2022 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Brittany T Kaliher.(Crapps, Jordan)
December 28, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Abigail Jaeger.(Crapps, Jordan)
December 21, 2022 Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Beam Technologies LLC.(Babb, Julius)
December 21, 2022 Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Beam Technologies LLC.(Babb, Julius)
December 21, 2022 Filing 5 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Andrew Patterson.(Babb, Julius)
December 21, 2022 Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Brittany T Kaliher.(kbos)
December 21, 2022 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Abigail Jaeger.(kbos)
December 21, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas Lexington County, case number 2022-CP-32-3970. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10859668), filed by Brittany T Kaliher, Beam Technologies LLC, Abigail Jaeger, Andrew Patterson. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(kbos)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jaeger et al v. Jaeger et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Jaeger
Represented By: Steve Allen Matthews
Represented By: Bryant S Caldwell
Represented By: Kevin A Hall
Represented By: Matthew Todd Carroll
Represented By: Gregory Zimmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SLP Advisory LLP
Represented By: Bryant S Caldwell
Represented By: Kevin A Hall
Represented By: Matthew Todd Carroll
Represented By: Steve Allen Matthews
Represented By: Gregory Zimmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Abigail Jaeger
Represented By: John T Lay
Represented By: Jordan M Crapps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brittany T Kaliher
Represented By: John T Lay
Represented By: Jordan M Crapps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beam Technologies LLC
Represented By: Julius Wistar Babb, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Andrew Patterson
Represented By: Julius Wistar Babb, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?