Potter et al v. Fontenot et al
Plaintiff: William Wade Potter and Johanna Potter
Defendant: Taylor Nicole Fontenot and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2023cv00477
Filed: February 3, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Sherri A Lydon
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2023 Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Order on Motion to Remand, 8 Notice Other placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Jeanette W. McBride, PO Box 2766Columbia, SC 29202-2766. ***DOCUMENT E-MAILED #7 Order on Motion to Remand, 8 Notice Other to Jeanette W. McBride, mcbridej@rcgov.us (Attachments: #1 Order NEF, #2 Order, #3 Clerk's NEF) (ahil)
February 10, 2023 Filing 8 Clerk's Notice: Attorneys are responsible for supplementing the State Record with all documents filed in Federal Court.(ahil)
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion to Remand. Signed by the Honorable Sherri A Lydon on February 10, 2023.(ahil)
February 9, 2023 Filing 6 Consent MOTION to Remand by Taylor Nicole Fontenot. Response to Motion due by 2/23/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Wilkerson, Elizabeth)
February 7, 2023 Filing 4 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice as to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Norris, Charles)
February 3, 2023 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.(ahil)
February 3, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Richland County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-CP-40-12. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10926692), filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: State Court Documents with ANSWER of Defendant Fontenot, #2 Exhibit 2: Arbitration)(ahil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Potter et al v. Fontenot et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Wade Potter
Represented By: Vincent A Sheheen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Johanna Potter
Represented By: Vincent A Sheheen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Taylor Nicole Fontenot
Represented By: Elizabeth Gunby Wilkerson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Represented By: Charles R Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?