Bevan v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
| Kathryn Bevan |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00636 |
| February 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONSENT AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 9/7/2023, Plaintiff ID of Expert Witness due by 10/5/2023, Defendant ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 11/2/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 12/14/2023, Discovery due by 12/28/2023, Motion in Limine due by 5/1/2024, Motions due by 1/11/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 3/27/2024, Jury Selection Deadline 5/22/2024, ADR Statement due by 8/28/2023, Mediation Due by 9/25/2023. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 4/14/2023. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 10 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Bryant, Lyndey) |
| Filing 9 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Kathryn Bevan.(Cauley, Penny) Modified to edit text on 4/6/2023 (cbru, ). |
| Filing 8 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Kathryn Bevan.(Cauley, Penny) |
| Filing 7 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Report due by 4/14/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 6/9/2023, Plaintiff ID of Expert Witness due by 7/7/2023, Defendant ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 8/4/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 8/4/2023, Discovery due by 9/29/2023, Motion in Limine due by 1/30/2024, Motions due by 10/13/2023, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 12/27/2023, Jury Selection Deadline 2/20/2024, ADR Statement due by 11/13/2023, Mediation Due by 12/8/2023. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 3/10/2023. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Bryant, Lyndey) |
| Filing 5 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Bryant, Lyndey) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (cbru, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Kathryn Bevan.(cbru, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-10944777) filed by Kathryn Bevan. Service due by 5/15/2023(cbru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bevan v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kathryn Bevan | |
| Represented By: | Penny Hays Cauley |
| Represented By: | William Kyle Geddings |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Lyndey Ritz Zwing Bryant |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
