Childs v. Advanced Capital Solutions, Inc.
| William Childs |
| Advanced Captial Solutions, Inc. and Advanced Capital Solutions, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv01070 |
| March 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT by William Childs. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents) (lbak) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Childs. Advanced Capital Solutions, Inc. served on 4/6/2023, answer due 4/27/2023. (lbak) |
| Filing 7 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #5 Order Service - Non-Inmate and #6 Summons Issued, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to William Childs, 4464 Devine St., Ste. M 1401, Columbia, SC 29205. (lbak) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Advanced Capital Solutions, Inc.. Service due by 6/15/2023. (lbak) |
Filing 5
ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk and directing plaintiff to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 3/16/2023. (lbak)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Advanced Capital Solutions, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 300103905.), filed by William Childs. (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
