Shokoohi v. Laitinen et al
Zahra Shokoohi |
Chip Laitinen and Antony Blinken |
3:2023cv03332 |
July 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 16. Reason: Multiple deficiencies. Corrected Filing Document Number #17 . Modified filing date to that of original filing: 8/23/202. Response due date modified to that of original filing: N/A. (cbru, ) |
Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Zahra Shokoohi. Antony Blinken served on 7/18/2023, answer due 9/18/2023; Chip Laitinen served on 7/18/2023, answer due 9/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Affidavits of Service, #2 Proofs of Service)(Acquaviva, Lauren) Modified to edit filing date and text on 8/30/2023 (cbru, ). |
Filing 15 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Joshua L. Goldstein, Esq ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-11270793) by Zahra Shokoohi. Response to Motion due by 8/30/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Application/Affidavit, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Court Admissions, #4 Letter Regarding Prior Discipline)No proposed order.(Acquaviva, Lauren) |
Filing 14 TEXT ORDER: On August 2, 2023, the Clerk of Court advised Plaintiff via email that the certificate of good standing filed at entry #10 in support of her #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice did not comply with Section 5 of the Application/Affidavit for Pro Hac Vice Admission. The Clerk further advised Plaintiff that if a certificate from the state court was not filed within ten (10) calendar days of the email, Judge Lewis would dismiss the motion without prejudice to refiling. As Plaintiff has failed to file such a certificate within the specified time, the motion is hereby dismissed without prejudice to refiling. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 8/15/2023.(cbru, ) |
Filing 13 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 12. Reason: Duplicate of entry #10. (cbru, ) |
Filing 10 Additional Attachments to Main Document #8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Joshua L. Goldstein. First attachment description: certificate of good standing . (Acquaviva, Lauren) Modified to edit entry linkage on 8/2/2023 (cbru, ). |
Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Joshua L. Goldstein (Filing fee $350 receipt number ASCDC-11225961) by Zahra Shokoohi. Response to Motion due by 8/8/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Acquaviva, Lauren) (Main Document 8 replaced on 7/27/2023) (cbru, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/27/2023: #1 Application/Affidavit, #2 Court Admissions, #3 Letter Regarding Certification, #4 Letter Regarding Prior Discipline) (cbru, ). Additional Attachment filed as entry #10 on 8/2/2023 (cbru, ). |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney. (cbru, ) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney General. (cbru, ) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken. (cbru, ) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Chip Laitinen. (cbru, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Zahra Shokoohi.(cbru, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Antony Blinken, Chip Laitinen (Filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-11202333) filed by Zahra Shokoohi. Service due by 10/10/2023(cbru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.