Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. Ford-Harris et al
Mid-Continent Casualty Company |
Tisha Ford-Harris and ResponseNow Inc. doing business as ResponseNow Medical Alert Systems |
3:2023cv03428 |
July 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J Polk on behalf of ResponseNow Inc. (Polk, Michael) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Creston William Brown on behalf of ResponseNow Inc. (Brown, Creston) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by H Freeman Belser on behalf of ResponseNow Inc. (Belser, H) |
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE by Mid-Continent Casualty Company. ResponseNow Inc. waiver executed on 8/14/2023, answer due 10/13/2023. (Grant, Siobhan) (Main Document 12 replaced on 8/16/2023) (cbru, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/16/2023: #1 Executed Waiver) (cbru, ). |
Filing 11 TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 8/8/2023.(cbru, ) |
Filing 10 Additional Attachments to Main Document #7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Timothy W. Odzer ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-11233294). First attachment description: Certificate of Good Standing from Florida Supreme Court . (Grant, Siobhan) |
Filing 9 Additional Attachments to Main Document #6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Pedro E. Hernandez ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-11233271). First attachment description: Certificate of Good Standing from Florida Supreme Court . (Grant, Siobhan) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Timothy W. Odzer ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-11233294) by Mid-Continent Casualty Company. Response to Motion due by 8/10/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Application for PHV Admission, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Grant, Siobhan) (Main Document 7 replaced on 8/1/2023) (cbru, ). Additional attachment filed as entry #10 on 8/07/2023 (cbru, ). |
Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Pedro E. Hernandez ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-11233271) by Mid-Continent Casualty Company. Response to Motion due by 8/10/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Application for PHV Admission, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Grant, Siobhan) (Main Document 6 replaced on 8/1/2023) (cbru, ). Additional attachment filed as entry #9 on 8/07/2023 (cbru, ). |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to ResponseNow Inc.. (mdea ) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Tisha Ford-Harris. (mdea ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Mid-Continent Casualty Company.(Grant, Siobhan) (Main Document 3 replaced on 7/27/2023) (cbru, ). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tisha Ford-Harris, ResponseNow Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11207736.), filed by Mid-Continent Casualty Company. Service due by 10/12/2023(asni, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/19/2023: #1 Exhibit A - Policy, #2 Exhibit B - UL Action) (asni, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.