Wilson v. Ally
| Olivia Wilson |
| Ally |
| 3:2023cv05151 |
| October 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Sherri A Lydon |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 OBJECTION to #8 Report and Recommendation by Olivia Wilson. Reply to Objections due by 12/1/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (ahil) |
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED 7 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and 9 Transfer of Case Management placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Olivia Wilson, 243 Drayton Hall Dr., West Columbia, SC 29172. (lbak) |
| Filing 9 ***CASE MANAGEMENT TRANSFERRED to civil case manager for Judge Sherri A. Lydon. Any future filings must be sent to the Clerk's Office at the following address: 901 Richland Street, Columbia, SC 29201. (lbak) |
| Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending the district court dismiss this action as frivolous and with prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 11/9/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 10/26/2023. (lbak) |
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) [#3] is granted for this case only. The undersigned notes that Plaintiff has paid the filing fee in prior cases filed within days of this one and has not been rendered destitute. Although the undersigned grants this motion, it is noted that Plaintiff's motion is a close call. Plaintiff is warned that the grant of IFP in this case is not an indication that it will be granted in future cases. Further, Plaintiff is reminded that the motion for IFP is signed under penalty of perjury, and the value of all assets and debts must be reported accurately.' Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 10/26/2023. (lbak)
|
| Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Olivia Wilson. (lbak) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Olivia Wilson. Response to Motion due by 10/30/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ally, filed by Olivia Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents) (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wilson v. Ally | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Olivia Wilson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ally | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
