Neil v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Lilly Neil |
Wal-Mart Stores East LP doing business as Wal-Mart Store #1286 |
3:2023cv05230 |
October 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Joseph F Anderson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #10 Order to Remand, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Jeanette McBride PO Box 2766 Columbia, SC 29202 (Attachments: #1 NEF) (jpet, ) |
Filing 12 ***DOCUMENT E-MAILED #10 Order to Remand, to Jeanette McBride (Attachments: #1 Certified Order, #2 NEF) (jpet, ) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Cancellation of Hearing: Rule 16 Conference set for 11/16/2023 at 10:00am (jpet, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Consent MOTION to Remand filed by Wal-Mart Stores East LP. Clerk's Notice: Attorneys are responsible for supplementing the State Record with all documents filed in Federal Court. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 11/14/2023. (jpet, ) |
Filing 9 Consent MOTION to Remand by Wal-Mart Stores East LP. Response to Motion due by 11/27/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Stipulation of Plaintiff as to Amount in Controversy)No proposed order.(Roberts, Randi) |
Filing 8 ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Rule 16 Conference set for 11/16/2023 at 10:00 AM in chambers of Honorable Joseph F Anderson Jr. Matters to be taken up at the conference will include all those items identified in Rule 16(a) and (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The attorneys of record shall conduct a conference pursuant to Rule 26(f) no later than 14 days prior to the date of the Rule 16 Conference. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 10/23/2023. (jpet, ) |
Filing 7 Amended Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Wal-Mart Stores East LP.(Roberts, Randi) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Wal-Mart Stores East LP. (jpet, ) |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Wal-Mart Stores East LP.(jpet, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Richland County Court of Commons Pleas, case number 2023CP4002681. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11383389), filed by Wal-Mart Stores East LP. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(jpet, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Neil v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lilly Neil | |
Represented By: | Christopher Shannon Leonard |
Represented By: | Joshua Snow Kendrick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East LP doing business as Wal-Mart Store #1286 | |
Represented By: | Randi Lynn Roberts |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.