Phillips v. New Friendly Enterprises, LLC et al
Nicole Phillips |
New Friendly Enterprises, LLC, Mahmood Ali, Anjum Lalani and Amin Khimani |
3:2024cv00309 |
January 19, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of any party, upon good cause shown within ninety (90) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 2/29/2024. (cbru, ) |
Filing 13 TEXT ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (Mahmood Ali answer due 2/29/2024; Amin Khimani answer due 2/29/2024; Anjum Lalani answer due 2/29/2024; New Friendly Enterprises, LLC answer due 2/29/2024) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 2/26/2024.(cbru, ) |
Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Mahmood Ali, Amin Khimani, Anjum Lalani, New Friendly Enterprises, LLC. Response to Motion due by 3/11/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Malone, Michael) Modified to edit motion relief on 2/26/2024 (cbru, ). |
Filing 11 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Nicole Phillips.(Cohoon, Jack) |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiff is reminded that Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are to be filed no later than 14 days after service of the notice of removal. Please file these answers to interrogatories no later than February 20, 2024.(cbru, ) |
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. (Mahmood Ali answer due 2/26/2024; Amin Khimani answer due 2/26/2024; Anjum Lalani answer due 2/26/2024; New Friendly Enterprises, LLC answer due 2/26/2024) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/26/2024.(cbru, ) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Mahmood Ali, Amin Khimani, Anjum Lalani, New Friendly Enterprises, LLC. Response to Motion due by 2/9/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Malone, Michael) |
Filing 6 REPLY by Mahmood Ali, Amin Khimani, Anjum Lalani, New Friendly Enterprises, LLC Joint Statement of All Defendants Regarding the Removal of This Case. (Malone, Michael) |
Filing 4 TEXT ORDER: The parties' attention is directed to the Court's Standing Order Regarding All Removed Cases Assigned to Judge Mary Geiger Lewis, located on the District Court's website at http://www.scd.uscourts.gov/Forms/Special_Instructions/Lewis_Standing%20_Order_Regarding_Removed_Cases.pdf. Not later than seven days from the entry of this Text Order, Defendant(s) shall file the information mandated by the Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Reply due by 1/29/2024) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/22/2024. (cbru, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Mahmood Ali, Amin Khimani, Anjum Lalani, New Friendly Enterprises, LLC.(cbru, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Lexington County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-CP-32-03584 (Filing fee $405 receipt number ASCDC-11536100) filed by Anjum Lalani, New Friendly Enterprises, LLC, Mahmood Ali, Amin Khimani. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(cbru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.