Classic Ford Lincoln of Columbia, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
| Classic Ford Lincoln of Columbia, Inc. |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 3:2024cv01223 |
| March 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Sherri A Lydon |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT E-MAILED #9 Order on Motion to Remand to mcbride.jeanette@richlandcountysc.gov and belcher.virginia@richlandcountysc.gov, and ***DOCUMENT MAILED #9 Order on Motion to Remand, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Jeanette W. McBride, Richland County Clerk of Court, PO Box 2766, Columbia, SC 29202-2766 (Attachments: #1 NEF, #2 Certified Order to Remand) (ahil) (Main Document 10 replaced on 4/22/2024) (ahil). Modified on 4/22/2024 (ahil). |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #6 Consent Motion to Remand. The attorneys in this case are responsible for supplementing the state court record with all documents filed in Federal Court. Signed by the Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on April 22, 2024.(ahil)
|
| Filing 8 Plaintiff's Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Classic Ford Lincoln of Columbia, Inc..(Walker, Harry) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT MOTION to Remand by Ford Motor Company. Response to Motion due by 4/1/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Strickland, Angela) Modified on 3/19/2024 to edit text (ahil). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Request for Protection from Court Appearance by Angela Gilbert Strickland for March 30, 2024 - April 9, 2024 (Strickland, Angela) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Richland County. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Ex B Notice of Removal)(Strickland, Angela) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Ford Motor Company.(ahil) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Richland County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2024-CP-40-874. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ASCDC-11644605), filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents Service of Summons and Complaint, #2 State Court Documents Summons and Complaint)(ahil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Classic Ford Lincoln of Columbia, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Classic Ford Lincoln of Columbia, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Harry Clayton Walker, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
| Represented By: | Angela Gilbert Strickland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
