Harco National Insurance Company v. Stinson et al
Harco National Insurance Company |
Isaac Stinson and Coleman Brothers Logging LLC |
3:2024cv01346 |
March 20, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Supplemental Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Harco National Insurance Company.(Kneece, Robert) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiff is reminded that Local Rule 26.01 includes Interrogatory H to be answered in any action in which jurisdiction is based on diversity under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a). Please file an answer to this interrogatory no later than April 4, 2024. (cbru, ) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Coleman Brothers Logging LLC. (cbru, ) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Isaac Stinson. (cbru, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Harco National Insurance Company.(cbru, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Coleman Brothers Logging LLC, Isaac Stinson (Filing fee $405 receipt number ASCDC-11660893) filed by Harco National Insurance Company. Service due by 6/18/2024 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Policy, #2 Exhibit B - Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Amended Summons and Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - Notice of Appearance)(cbru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.