Wilson v. Progress Energy Service Co LLC
| 4:2005cv03597 |
| December 28, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Terry L Wooten |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
ORDER denying 136 Motion for Reconsideration Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 12/11/2009.(prou, )
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Court accepts 124 Report and Recommendation, finds that 94 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Carolina Power & Light Company is proper and this case is dismissed. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 8/17/09. (swel, )
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 70 Report and Recommendations, 59 Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Strike filed by Carolina Power & Light Company, Progress Energy Service Co LLC.: Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report is ACCEPTED (Document #70) and that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Document #59) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 03/20/2009. (dsto, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wilson v. Progress Energy Service Co LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
