United States of America v. 36110 dollars in US Currency et al
United States of America |
36110 dollars in US Currency and One 2000 Ford Windstar Automobile VIN#2FMZA5149YBC46103 |
Oya S Williams |
4:2008cv00029 |
January 4, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Florence Office |
Florence |
Terry L Wooten |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 99 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court ACCEPTS the 91 Report. The United States' 73 Motion for Default Judgment is granted as to potential claimants Bright, Headley, and Williams, and a Decree of Forfe iture is to be entered directing that Defendant Properties, $36,110.00 in United States Currency and One 2000 Ford Windstar Automobile, White in Color, Vin # 2FMZA5149YBC46103, be forfeited to the United States and allowing the United States Mar shal's Service to dispose of Defendant Properties as provided by law. All other pending motions are deemed MOOT. (Docs. # 57 , 58 , 59 , 74 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , and 85 ). Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 3/14/2011. (prou, ) |
Filing 31 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Court accepts 28 Report and Recommendation, and denies 9 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Sherrod V Bright. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 3/12/09. (swel, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.