Miller v. Independent Health Services et al
David Thomas Miller |
Independent Health Services and Dillon County Detention Center |
4:2008cv03745 |
November 13, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Prison:Prison Condition Office |
Dillon |
G Ross Anderson |
Thomas E Rogers |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. This Court finds that the magistrate applied sound legal principles to the facts of this case. Therefore, this Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 43 is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 8/18/2010. (mcot, ) |
Filing 32 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Court accepts and adopts in its entirety 13 Report and Recommendation. The Dillon County Detention Center is DISMISSED from the above-captioned case without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 9/11/09. (swel, ) |
Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending 1 Complaint filed by David Thomas Miller be dismissed as to the Dillon County Detention Center without prejudice and without issuance and serviceof process. Objections to R&R due by 1/9/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 12/19/08. (swel, ) (swel, ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.