Earley v. Ozmint
Petitioner: Steven Roy Earley, Jr
Respondent: John Ozmint
Case Number: 4:2008cv03961
Filed: December 10, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Lexington
Presiding Judge: G Ross Anderson
Presiding Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER RULING ON 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court adopts the 35 Report and Recommendation in its entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the 26 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by John Ozmint, Warden Perry Correctional Institution is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 12/08/09. (sste )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Earley v. Ozmint
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven Roy Earley, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Ozmint
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?