Reaves v. Rhodes et al
Plaintiff: Franklin C Reaves
Defendant: Sherry R Rhodes, Jerry Vinson, Marion County Sheriff Department, Mark Richardson, Albert Woodbury, Levon Nichols, Bobby L Crawford, Marion County Jail, Tim Harper, Willie D Reaves, Marion, City of, Sellers, Town of and William Young
Case Number: 4:2009cv00820
Filed: March 31, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Marion
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Thomas E Rogers
Presiding Judge: Terry L Wooten
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court ACCEPTS the Report. (Doc. # 120 ). Therefore, for the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, the motion for attorneys' fees filed by defendant City of Marion (D oc. # 107 ) is GRANTED in the amount of $3,496.00 and the motion for attorneys' fees and costs filed by the defendants Mark Richardson, Albert Woodbury, Levon Nichols (a/k/a Leverne Nichols), Bobby L. Crawford, Tim Harper, Town of Sellers, Hybert N. Strickland, and Donna Owens (Doc. # 113 ) is GRANTED in the amount of $6,965.37. The plaintiff filed a motion to file objections to the Report and Recommendation out of time and attached objections to the motion (Doc. # 123 ). This mo tion to file objections out of time (Doc. # 123 ) is GRANTED. In ruling on the Report and Recommendation, this Court has considered all materials the plaintiff submitted in response to the Report, including the objections attached to his motion to f ile objections out of time (Doc. # 123 ). The plaintiff has not presented a sufficient basis to justify a stay of this action. Therefore, the plaintiff's motion for a stay (Doc. # 124 ) is DENIED. The plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. # 111 ) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 11/3/2011. (prou, )
May 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court accepts the 88 Report. Therefore, for the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, the 64 motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants Mark Richardson, Albe rt Woodbury, Levon Nichols (a/k/a Leverne Nichols), Bobby L. Crawford, Tim Harper, Town of Sellers, Hybert N. Strickland, and Donna Owens is GRANTED, and the 65 motion for summary judgment filed by the City of Marion is GRANTED. In addition, the p laintiff's claims against Willie D. Reaves are DISMISSED because the plaintiff has not alleged a sufficient nexus to create state action by Willie D. Reaves for purposes of liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In light of these rulings, this case is DISMISSED in its entirety. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 5/27/2011. (prou, )
December 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the District Court partially summarily dismiss the Amended Complaint in this case without prejudice and without issuance and service of process as to Defendants Rhodes, Vinson, Young, Marion County Jail, Marion County Sheriff Department, South Carolina Departmentof Social Services, Mayor Luvenia Wright, Mayor Bobby Gerald, and C. Smith. Objections to R&R due by 1/11/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 12/10/2009. (dsto, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reaves v. Rhodes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Franklin C Reaves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sherry R Rhodes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jerry Vinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marion County Sheriff Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Albert Woodbury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Levon Nichols
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bobby L Crawford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marion County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tim Harper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Willie D Reaves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marion, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sellers, Town of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?