Wise v. Chief Michael Schwartz et al
| Chief Michael Schwartz, Georgetown County Detention Center, Correctional Officer Rodriguez and Captain Wineglass |
| Chris William Wise |
| 4:2009cv02417 |
| September 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Florence Office |
| Georgetown |
| Henry F Floyd |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court adopts the Report and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of the Court that Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to prosecutepursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by Honorable Henry F Floyd on 06/10/2010. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations 11 and dismissing Defendant Georgetown County Detention Center without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Henry F Floyd on December 8, 2009.(csam)
|
|
Filing
11
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the District Court dismiss the Georgetown County Detention Center from 1 Complaint without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 12/4/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 11/16/2009. (dsto, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
